Places, Types, Archives and Records: Alvaro Siza and his Legacy
A critical review of ‘Neighbourhood: Where Álvaro meets Aldo’. Nuno Grande and Roberto Cremascoli, exhibition catalogue for the Portuguese Pavilion in the 2016 Architectural Biennale, published by Hatje Cantz (2016). Platon Issaias. The Journal of Architecture, volume 23, issue 7-8, 1316-1320.
Whether it’s an agricultural fair or an art biennale, every national participation in every international exhibition faces an almost impossible challenge, which is a result of a structural problem. The power relations that reside within and define geopolitical asymmetries produce a pattern where culture, politics and ideology suffer both from unconstrained nationalism and the desire to be ‘international’. The fetishisation of everything ‘local’, every ‘original’ place, artefact and product enters a predefined grid that organises it as part of an ‘international’, ‘global’ heritage and production of meaning and value. The very idea of the ‘local’ is not just the residue of colonial practices, it’s colonialism itself: a network of forces that violently produces types, standards, subjects and commodities.
[…]
There is something fascinating in Nuno Grande and Roberto Cremascoli’s curatorial project for the Portuguese Pavilion in the 2016 Architectural Biennale. Grande and Cremascoli decided to organise an exhibition about Alvaro Siza, but instead of just celebrating his legacy and persona, they aimed to push it towards a different direction.
[…]
The curators’ sincere effort to present alternative, less celebratory and inclusive narratives for the four neighborhoods fall into some well-known traps. There is a particular ideological bias that talks of some sort of ‘European-ess’, a remnant of a social-democratic, federalist European dream that even if it did, definitely doesn’t make sense anymore. ‘Fortress Europe’ of extreme securitisation, unapologetic nationalisms and far-right violence, has merged with inter-EU colonization of the sovereign debt crisis. A massive retreat in public spending has made the right to housing sound like an impossible political goal. In ‘Neighborhood: Where Alvaro meets Aldo’ there is a romantic belief that the character of the architect and good, or at least ‘better’, design is enough to sort it out. This is not true; without an uncompromising attack on the complex mechanisms that financialised and de-territorialise land and housing there is no hope. We need compulsory purchase of land, serious control of profit in real estate, the dismantling of oligopolies in the construction industry and the overall rethinking of standards, protocols, comfort, materials and the way we live together and we take care of each other. Alexander Alves Costa’s magnificent testimony on Bairro da Bouça and the SAAL (Serviço de Apoio Ambulatório Local) shows us the way to do it: neighborhood associations and collectives, citizen initiatives and political organization. As in revolutionary Portugal, we need radical political and design experimentation.